|
Systems Sorted By Performance |
Thunder & Lightning |
CineBench R20 Scores
 
|
Thunder III @ 4.3 GHz x 64 cores = 24763
|
Thunder II @ 4.5 GHz x 32 cores = 17449
|
Lightning III @ 4.0 GHz x 24 cores = 13479
|
Thunder I @ 4.7 GHz x 16 cores = 9148
|
Lightning II @ 4.8 GHz x 18 cores = 8848
|
Lightning I @ 5.3 GHz x 10 cores = 6447
|
|
CineBench R20 Scores
 
|
Thunder III @ 4.3 GHz x 64 cores = 24763
|
Thunder II @ 4.5 GHz x 32 cores = 17449
|
Thunder I @ 4.7 GHz x 16 cores = 9148
|
Lightning III @ 4.0 GHz x 24 cores = 13479
|
Lightning II @ 4.8 GHz x 18 cores = 8848
|
Lightning I @ 5.3 GHz x 10 cores = 6447
|
|
The Cinebench benchmark will greatly favor systems with higher core counts. You can see that the Thunder models score signficantly higher than the Lightning
models in this respect. However, in terms of SINGLE CORE SPEED, the Lightning models are each faster than their corresponding Thunder models. We do not have
data metrics online that demonstrate this. If you will not be running more than 10 CPU-intensive programs at the same time, a Lightning model will best suit your needs.
For those with custom software designed to take advantage of as many CPU cores as possible, the Thunder product line is definitely for you.
|
|
|