Nuclear Lightning Logo
Products & Features Products & Features >> Benchmarks         MAIN PAGE
Workstations
Lightning I W
Lightning II W
Lightning III W

Thunder I W
Thunder II W
Thunder III W
Servers
Lightning I S
Lightning II S
Lightning III S

Thunder I S
Thunder II S
Thunder III S
Benchmarks
Lightning vs. Thunder
Contact Us
info@nuclearlightning.com
610-333-2525
Lightning vs Thunder Quick Reference Guide

Systems Sorted By Performance Thunder & Lightning
CineBench R20 Scores

 

Thunder III

Thunder III @ 4.3 GHz x 64 cores = 24763

Thunder II

Thunder II @ 4.5 GHz x 32 cores = 17449

Lightning III

Lightning III @ 4.0 GHz x 24 cores = 13479

Thunder I

Thunder I @ 4.7 GHz x 16 cores = 9148

Lightning II

Lightning II @ 4.8 GHz x 18 cores = 8848

Lightning I

Lightning I @ 5.3 GHz x 10 cores = 6447

CineBench R20 Scores

 

Thunder III

Thunder III @ 4.3 GHz x 64 cores = 24763

Thunder II

Thunder II @ 4.5 GHz x 32 cores = 17449

Thunder I

Thunder I @ 4.7 GHz x 16 cores = 9148

Lighting III

Lightning III @ 4.0 GHz x 24 cores = 13479

Lightning II

Lightning II @ 4.8 GHz x 18 cores = 8848

Lightning I

Lightning I @ 5.3 GHz x 10 cores = 6447


The Cinebench benchmark will greatly favor systems with higher core counts. You can see that the Thunder models score signficantly higher than the Lightning models in this respect. However, in terms of SINGLE CORE SPEED, the Lightning models are each faster than their corresponding Thunder models. We do not have data metrics online that demonstrate this. If you will not be running more than 10 CPU-intensive programs at the same time, a Lightning model will best suit your needs. For those with custom software designed to take advantage of as many CPU cores as possible, the Thunder product line is definitely for you.

Copyright ©2019 by Nuclear Lightning Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved. | company info | privacy policy | return policy |